Does Animal Poaching Lead To Other Crimes

This module is a resource for lecturers

Implications of wild fauna trafficking

Although threats to wild animals and plant species come from multiple sources, such as pollution, deforestation, destruction of natural habitats and climate change, wildlife trafficking contributes significantly to the trouble through poaching, harvesting, or depleting significant quantities of already endangered or at-take a chance species. Trafficking in wildlife, animal parts, and plants has far-reaching implications, not only for the species involved, but also for human livelihoods, biodiversity, and governance. The diverse and meaning implications of wild fauna trafficking, in plow, mean that the protection of wildlife, forests, and fish 'must be part of a comprehensive approach to achieving poverty eradication, nutrient security, sustainable development, including the conservation and sustainable use of biological diversity, economic growth, social well-being and sustainable livelihoods' (UN General Assembly, 19 August 2015).

Endangering species

Trafficking in wildlife can diminish species populations and crusade local or fifty-fifty global extinction. When endangered species are involved, any poaching or harvesting of that species to supply the illegal trade risks the species becoming extinct. Farther worsening the problem is the fact that the need for larger and more ornate specimens ways that hunters and collectors oftentimes aim for the fittest individuals from the convenance population, with serious consequences for subsequent generations (Rosen & Smith, 2010). Moreover, many endangered species are frail and crave practiced and delicate treatment. The means in which many animals and plants are caught, transported, and kept, however, often cause injury, death, or attrition, resulting in further losses especially when living animals or plants are trafficked (United nations ECOSOC, 4 March 2003).

Ecological costs

Wildlife trafficking is related to some of the virtually of import underlying causes of biodiversity loss (Broad et al, 2012). It can threaten ecosystem functions. Beyond endangering species via population losses, wildlife overexploitation can cause long term ecological bug such as creating sex-ratio imbalances and slowing the reproduction charge per unit of vulnerable species. With respect to the old trouble, elephant poaching of bull elephants (i.e. males with large tusks) has left a severe gender imbalance among African elephants. Consequently, population recovery amidst elephants has been slowed because it has affected reproduction rates. With regard to slow reproduction rates, species like macaws have an extremely slow reproduction rate compared to others in the parrot family. Because macaws have historically been targeted disproportionately by poachers, their populations are less likely to rebound with fewer and fewer macaws left to reproduce with.

Population decline is further problematic if keystone species are affected by illicit merchandise. Keystone species have 'a significant direct and indirect result on their surrounding ecosystem and other species inside that ecosystem' (Moreto & Pires, 2018, p. 19). Sharks, for example, accept a cardinal role in the oceanic organization by preying upon smaller fish. Unfortunately, equally a consequence of shark finning that has decimated shark populations globally, populations of smaller fish have significantly increased leading to a reject in shellfish (Ferretti et al, August 2010).

Furthermore, ecosystems accept been contradistinct through environmentally destructive practices to remove wild animals, timber, and fish. In Republic of peru, for instance, the demand for woods products has led to several iconic species becoming threatened with extinction (Global Witness, 2017). With regard to destructive line-fishing practices, cyanide and dynamite is used at times to capture fish by stunning them; this practice can also impale many other nearby fish and destroy coral reefs that provide a habitat for many aquatic species (McManus et al, 1997).

Animal cruelty

The methods used by poachers to kill or capture animals and the way animals are handled are often extremely cruel and fail to comply with animate being welfare standards. Furthermore, many transportation and concealment methods are harmful to animals and many specimens autumn ill, are injured, starve or die otherwise in transit (Rosen & Smith, 2010). Trafficking live animals can upshot in high fatality rates for the specimens involved, peculiarly if animals are stored and fed inadequately (run across further, Baker, 2013). As mentioned above, indiscriminate methods used to catch animals, such as cyanide line-fishing, can also harm and kill non-target species, deplete fishing populations, and impairment ecosystems (meet farther, Dee, 2014). Non further discussed hither, though still worthy of note, are animal rights and ethical perspectives that abet more broadly against the killing, use, and consumption of (wild) animals.

Threats to other species

Beyond the direct negative biological bear upon on specific species, the illegal wild fauna merchandise can have indirect impacts from a conservation perspective. The two almost obvious examples are detrimental by-catch of not-target species and the introduction of harmful alien species into a habitat. Examples of detrimental by-take hold of are particularly well known from the fisheries sector: nets, lines, and other fishing gear used to take hold of the desired fish will also grab everything else in their path, including turtles, dolphins, and juvenile fish. Terrestrial examples include impacts on non-target species from activities such as logging and waterfowl hunting (Broad et al, 2012).

Biosecurity risks

Wildlife trafficking can pose health threats to humans, native species, and livestock, peculiarly if it introduces viruses, bacteria, or species to which native populations are non adequately resistant (Rosen & Smith, 2010). Exotic species that are trafficked can pose a biosecurity chance because they can potentially establish themselves in the wild and go pests. They can also acquit seeds, parasites, and viruses which, if released to the surroundings, would have negative impacts on native wildlife, and on the agriculture, horticulture, and aquaculture industries (Alacs & Georges, 2008). Negative impacts of conflicting species introductions caused by wildlife trafficking are less well documented; some of the more problematic examples take been linked to deliberate movements of ornamental plants and game fish species outside their natural ranges (Broad et al, 2012).

Bushmeat trade is the commercial hunting and selling of wild animals for food, and bushmeat is an important source of nutrient and social/cultural values in many parts of the world. For many wealthy consumers, bushmeat may be considered a 'status symbol' that enables them to stay connected to their ancestral cultures. There are besides significant risks to human health from killing, handling and butchering wild meat: wildlife-related diseases can exist transmitted from animals to humans, including Ebola and retroviruses.

(FAO, 2015)

Threats and violence

Poachers and hunters are often armed with guns or other weapons that are used not but to kill, capture, or collect wildlife, but are also employed against rangers, conservation officials, police, and local people who protect or live in close proximity to endangered animals or plants. Rangers around the earth are killed at a high rate. Over the last decade, some one,000 rangers have died in the line of duty in Africa solitary. Threats and violence can often escalate - forth with the scale of depletion - if organized criminal groups go involved in wild fauna, forest, and fisheries crime (for further reading, see Module 3 of the E4J University Module Series on Organized Criminal offense). This also heightens the take chances of corruption at many stages of the illegal wildlife merchandise (Rosen & Smith, 2010). Increased militarization of anti-poaching efforts can sometimes atomic number 82 to 'shoot kickoff' policies that can ultimately lead to more deaths of potential offenders and escalate violence between those on the frontline and locals (Moreto & Pires, 2018). For further reading on green violence, delight refer to Module three of the E4J university Module Series on Wildlife crime.

Depleting natural resource and threatening livelihoods

Wildlife trafficking undermines and threatens the ability and efforts past States to manage their natural resources. It can consequence in severe economic losses, which particularly affect developing countries that rely on revenue generated by legal trade (Rosen & Smith, 2010). Wild fauna, woods, and fisheries crime can threaten rural livelihoods where people'south subsistence and income rely on wildlife, including those based on ecotourism.

Governance and conflict

Wild animals trafficking can undermine good governance and the rule of police force and, in some cases, threaten national stability. For example, the UN Security Council, for case, has repeatedly expressed concern that the internal armed conflict and widespread breakdown of law and order in the Central African Commonwealth was fuelled by armed groups and criminal networks that benefited from illicit exploitation of natural resource, including wild animals and wild animals products, in that country (United Nations Security Quango, 2013; United Nations Security Quango, 2018). Several reports also document the touch on of land clearance for mining operations and infrastructure projects on local animal species and humans in the Democratic Democracy of Congo. Many of the affected areas are home to endangered mountain gorillas that are displaced, lose their nutrient supply, or that are poached for use as bush-league meat that is and so sold to miners and armed groups (Southward & Brisman, 2013; Nellemann et al, 2010).

Similarly, in the example of the armed conflicts in the Great Lakes Region of Africa, the Report of the Expert Group on the Autonomous Democracy of the Congo noted that the 'slaughter of elephants in the Democratic Republic of the congo is one of the nigh tragic consequences of years of state of war and poor governance'. In 2014, the Security Council drew attention to the linkage betwixt the illicit trade in natural resource, including poaching and illegal trafficking of wild animals, and the proliferation and trafficking of arms. According to the Security Council this constitutes one of the major factors fuelling the conflict in the Not bad Lakes Region (Strydom, 2016).